Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City of Blacktown Pipe Band (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

City of Blacktown Pipe Band
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Zero secondary sources. Cannot locate sufficient sourcing to indicate notability per WP:NORG. AusLondonder (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music,  and Australia. AusLondonder (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, no usable secondary sources found in my search. Yes, the competitions technically make a WP:NBAND#9 case, but it seems to me that piping is an insular world, and that success in that field in no way correlates to actual coverage. Even in the three specialty sources for piping I found (pipedrums.com, pipingpress.com, bagpipe.news)  this band lacked coverage. Searches in Trove, ProQuest, newspapers.com and NewspaperArchive also failed to find anything other than routine coverage, which convinces me that other offline sources probably don't exist. Mach61 (talk) 16:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreferenced, Mach61's comprehensive searches above prove that no reliable sourcing is available. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 22:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: the only sourcing that exists online stem from publications about piping. WP:BAND#9 is loosely met but they aren't really major, couple of local/regional competitions, some national wins, though, but it's not only unsourced and doesn't seem notable. there's WP:OR here as well. She was  a fairy 01:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.