Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City of Canterbury budget 2010−2011


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I've userfied the article for the requesting author Black Kite (t) (c) 00:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

City of Canterbury budget 2010−2011

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unencyclopaedic article about one budget of hundreds of a district council. Reads like a political propaganda piece and doesn't actually give due balance to the overall budget itself. Coatrack article, etc. GTD 14:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - The budget itself doesn't appear to be notable. The potential closure of the museums appears to have a lot of coverage but I'd refer to WP:NOTNEWS. If it is kept the article needs a serious clean-up. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:NOTNEWS. Nsk92 (talk) 16:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like a coatrack. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- obviously non-encyclopedic. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:42, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete but give me a few days to tidy up affected articles and images: No worries, you can have this one. I've copied it outside Wikipedia as per the guidelines.  However, please would you kindly give me at least another few days as from this message before deletion, so that I can tidy up links etc. - otherwise the deletion will leave a mess which others will not know how to clear up.  Since I last edited the budget article, much has happened regarding this budget which has affected the content of other articles.--Storye book (talk) 10:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * @ George The Dragon: at the same time as proposing the deletion, you removed all reference to the budget from Whitstable Museum and Gallery, yet that one is the only one to have been physically affected by the budget so far. Some of the exhibits described in the article were removed to make the space cited in the budget proposal. The other institutions affected by the budget all need a note and citations to say that the Council has voted to close them in in 2011, after a year's reprieve. The images will have to be re-categorised. These tasks will not be difficult so long as the Budget article remains so that I can copy citations, but the task will be time-consuming.--Storye book (talk) 10:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.