Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City of caterpillar

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT. Stormie 08:25, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

City of caterpillar
Band with no hits on Google. --LeeHunter 02:44, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * delete. Mikkalai 03:05, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * delete -- Fred 03:28, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Band vanity. Delete. --Slowking Man 04:23, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 23:29, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I have one of this band's albums and this band is critically acclaimed and very much respected in their "scene". I get dozens and dozens of good hits with Google. They have quit playing together. I agree that this article should be deleted though, as there's a better article at City of Caterpillar. --Ilpanula 17:42, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Oops. You're quite right. I don't know how I screwed up my search so badly. Anyway, as you say, there's a better article. --LeeHunter 21:06, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Case closed. Turned into a redirect to City of Caterpillar. Mikkalai 06:36, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Keep. Informational and unbiased.  Does not violate Wikipedia rules.  Would like to see more info on the artist, however.  Allow for growth. z0mb1
 * There's a better and more informational article at City of Caterpillar. Different capitalisation. --Ilpanula 04:17, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)