Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City of chicago pipe band


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Although User:Jcuk is quite correct that WP:MUSIC isn't necessarily appropriate for pipe bands &amp; such, I found the counter-argument that the article doesn't even attempt to establish notability of any kind compelling. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 12:51, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

City of chicago pipe band
They don't seem to satisfy WP:MUSIC, although they have a better-looking web page than most bands we delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:58, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Movementarian 03:42, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, or at very least move to City of Chicago pipe band Josh Parris #: 13:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep its unlikely any pipe band will ever satisfy WP:MUSIC but as thats just a guideline anyhow does it matter? They may well be "notable" in pipe band circles, and they are verifiable. Jcuk 21:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Indeed, WP:MUSIC does seem to allow for some leeway when talking about non-mainstream types of music. The article doesn't give any attempt at evidence that they are notable in pipe band circles, and I was unable to find anything on Google. If I am wrong then let me know; I'll gladly withdraw the nomination. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:22, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't estabilish notability.  Grue   17:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.