Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citybus Route 962


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 20:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Citybus Route 962

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a directory of bus services. Nothing in article or references to suggest that this passes WP:GNG. Shame there isn't a speedy cat for unremarkable bus services. TheLongTone (talk) 14:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * delete- per wp:notguide--Quek157 (talk) 15:39, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * comment - i tried to ran a earwig copyvio for G12. Didn't find anything regretably. But found source 1 is operator website, source 2 is another wiki, I am a native Chinese Speaker and Reader (though I am not a China / HK citizen), so I am confident in my ability to read the sources. With this, it is not only WP:NOTGUIDE, but clear WP:GNG. I am pro for transport pages to be retained (and argue vociferously before - see my Afd on london bus routes (2nd nomination), but sadly this is a NO). Quek157 (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:NOTGUIDE Acnetj (talk) 18:13, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 03:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nothing overly special about this route that deserves an article. Plus also WP:NOTGUIDE. Ajf773 (talk) 04:08, 6 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.