Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cityline (ISP)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  02:31, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Cityline (ISP)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Delete as it fails WP:NCORP, and no reliable sources have been found LusikSnusik (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:11, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet,  and Russia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable part of the Runet history, meets WP:GNG. For example:
 * 1) Chapter "9. Нескучный Провайдер «Ситилайн»" in the book "Ощупывая слона. Заметки по истории русского Интернета", 2004 by Sergey Kuznetsov
 * 2) A section about Cityline in an article about Runet history in RFE/RL: https://www.svoboda.org/a/30204033.html#%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BD
 * 3) Substantial coverage in contemporary media, for example, ru:Компания (журнал) issue from 21.06.99: https://www.compromat.ru/page_24318.htm
 * --PaulT2022 (talk) 04:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.