Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citylink Neihu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Citylink (Taiwanese shopping malls). Less Unless (talk) 14:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Citylink Neihu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I don't like having to base this on articles I can evaluate only approximately, but it seems clear that the references are mere notices and PR. If there is any actual notability, it would be for the chain, not this branch.  DGG ( talk ) 08:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

 Keep Here are the sources included in the article:      <li></li> </ol>These sources provide significant coverage of the shopping mail's origins and its tenants and amenities. In addition, this article from the Liberty Times briefly discusses the performance of the shopping mall. There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Citylink Neihu to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 09:45, 6 June 2021 (UTC) </li></ul> <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge with Citylink Songshan and Citylink Nangang into a single article on the chain (like on the Chinese Wikipedia: zh:CITYLINK (購物中心)). Or keep until somebody does the merging. —Kusma (talk) 15:19, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The other two articles (Citylink Songshan and Citylink Nangang) are now redirects to Citylink (Taiwanese shopping malls), and this one should be as well. If anyone has suggestions what to do with infoboxes or xlink templates and what images to choose, please help. —Kusma (talk) 21:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * that suggested merge would be a good solution.  DGG ( talk ) 07:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @DGG, I can have a go at writing a merge target (translating from the Chinese article) over the next couple days. Do you have a good suggestion for the best disambiguator? Citylink (shopping malls)?? —Kusma (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * there is already an article for CityLink Mall, in Singapore. I gather it is unrelated to these; if so you might try Citylink (Taiwan). I think this is a little confusing, since Citylink almost always refers to some sort of transportation service, but the WP rules call for the minimum necessary. See the disambiguation page,  Citylink, which illustrates the confusion caused by our current rule.  DGG ( talk ) 17:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The Citylink here refers to malls that are connected to rapid transit stations, so the name isn't as stupid as I had originally thought (source in English if you care). Will probably go for Citylink (Taiwanese shopping malls) so the article title doesn't look like it's about something else. —Kusma (talk) 19:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @Cunard, DGG, see User:Kusma/sandbox/1 for a bare-bones merged version (with a little extra text). Move that to mainspace, add some pictures, redirect all? —Kusma (talk) 22:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * fine with me. Glad to see the explanation of the name.  DGG ( talk ) 22:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: I support a merge/redirect to Citylink (Taiwanese shopping malls). Cunard (talk) 08:25, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge, as per DGG and Cunard. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.