Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cityside


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --Tito xd (?!?) 00:06, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Cityside
One of a series of articles on Afd promoting a non-notable group.
 * Delete Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   09:02, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. no Google hits on Church plus leadership = non-notable.  See also related Articles for deletion/Stations of the Cross - Contemporary Icons to Reflect On at Easter --Kgf0 23:17, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Umm... try this search. Seems like a fairly wide variety of references.--SarekOfVulcan 00:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment That search gives 36 Googles - not a lot really!   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   00:33, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Response Ah, that's what I get for only going 2 pages down. :-) In any case, I'm not voting either way on this -- it doesn't seem as clearcut to me as their Stations of the Cross link was.
 * And that's what I get for assuming a vanity page would spell the ex-pastor's name correctly. However, at 36 hits, I stand by my previous vote.  Unless someone can come up with a real claim to notability. --Kgf0 17:44, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I was the submitter of these three articles (Cityside, Mark Pearson, Stations of the Cross) - my intent was not promotion as such but the recognition of a person, group and phenomenon which have been influential in NZ and internationally in the alt.worship and emerging church movements, well out of proportion to the group's numbers. If the criterion is that they are already widely recognised elsewhere than Wikipedia, I accept that as a reason for deletion, with regret. MikeRM 19:38, 6 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.