Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cityvantage

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:53, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

Cityvantage
Not notable, spam only. So Sayeth Aaron Brenneman 5 July 2005 10:56 (UTC)
 * Delete, as above --Excession 5 July 2005 12:29 (UTC)
 * Delete, spam, ad, only three cities presently. Make it go away. --WCFrancis 5 July 2005 14:33 (UTC)
 * Delete because not notable. Sietse 5 July 2005 15:06 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, ad. Jaxl 5 July 2005 17:03 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant ad/spam. --Etacar11 6 July 2005 00:16 (UTC)
 * Delete spam, and bad spam at that - sad --Muchosucko 6 July 2005 01:24 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable advertising. JamesBurns 6 July 2005 06:49 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.