Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civic Youth Orchestra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 00:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Civic Youth Orchestra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are many youth orchestras like this one, and while they are very worthy organizations, one wouldn't normally expect to find articles about all of them in an encyclopedia. Does this particular youth orchestra rise above the others in significance, to the degree that it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria? FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:24, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 19:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 19:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 19:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 19:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks reliable sources. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:27, 2 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam and per WP:DIRECTORY – a children's orchestra that clearly lacks any substance for claims of notability.  Ohconfucius  ping / poke 04:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete While it is clearly a worthy group and one that has been around for 60 years, it doesn't have the necessary significant coverage from reliable sources to meet WP:ORG. It does get mentioned in multiple regional papers, but that is all: mentions, calendar items, etc. Sorry. --MelanieN (talk) 01:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.