Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civil Coping Mechanisms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:01, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Civil Coping Mechanisms

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability. Article is for a publisher; article's refs link only to publisher's website and site of a company article says publisher is in business with. 47 non-duplicate ghits are mostly simple listings of books or mentions by the company's authors; no 3rd person coverage of company found. Article created under user name similar to name of co-founder of company; same user has been primary editor. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC) Added note - article creator is concerned about whether the page could be recreated should the publisher achieve notability. I assured him that was not likely to be a problem. Toward that end, I'm specifically requesting that the pag not be salted (not that it was likely to be anyway.) --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per the lack of reliable sources. The article cites no secondary reliable sources and a Google search returns none. Because this article violates Verifiability and the topic fails Notability, this article should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 04:59, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.