Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civil War of Albany and Cornwall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Deleted as false historical articles. (aeropagitica) 07:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Civil War of Albany and Cornwall and related articles

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no period referred to as the "Civil War of Albany and Cornwall" in Geoffrey's Historia, and no critical literature which calls it that either. The only sites on the internet using the phrase are Wikipedia mirrors. It contains no information that couldn't be accounted for under the names of the characters involved. Unless a non-Wikipedia-derived source can be found for the title, it should be deleted (.The same applies to other made-up articles like Interregnum of Severus, Civil War of the Five Kings, First War of the Two Brothers and Second War of the Two Brothers. Nicknack009 23:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You forgot Saxon Interregnum ➥the Epopt 03:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * WEll spotted. Added. --Nicknack009 13:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete all per nom. I'm not 100% sure how this information should ideally be handled, but this seems incorrect (the analogy of in-universe history for a fantasy entertainment springs to mind). It is strange how the succession boxes are being used, too -- a war is not a "legendary king". I have added AFDs to the other articles pointing here. --Dhartung | Talk 07:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.