Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civiq Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Civiq Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Civiq Society was previously tagged for the proposed deletion process, as shown by the edit history, and the article talk page indicates that several Wikipedians have been looking for more evidence of notability of the organization for years. Other than links to websites posted by I.P. editors (who appear to have a conflict of interest), there have not been any references posted since the PROD process that establish notability of the organization, and the website links are not Wikipedia reliable sources for any information they contain. The deletion guidelines that fit this article include


 * 1) Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject)
 * 2) Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources,
 * 3) Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed
 * 4) Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline

I have made my own search for reliable sources on this organization, and have found none. It does not appear that any fact about the organization can be verified by an independent reliable source. In particular, there is no indication whatever that the organization is notable enough to be an entry in an edited encyclopedia for general readership. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 15:50, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There needs to be a "delete all" app with a provision to uncheck the less obvious articles. This one wouldn't be unchecked. Tom Reedy (talk) 22:13, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ORG. Not only does the article not assert notability, it basically confirms non-notability. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 16:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.