Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civita (think tank)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Civita (think tank)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

organization with no reliable sources since at least 2008; I tried to find it mentioned anywhere even vaguely reliable and came up with nothing ~TPW 15:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ~TPW 15:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Norway. Shellwood (talk) 16:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, hopeless nomination. This is Norway's Heritage Foundation. Geschichte (talk) 14:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * There's a paragraph about them here: Lawson, R., Norton, S., Gwartney, J. (2008). Economic Freedom of the World: 2008 Annual Report. Philippines: Cato Institute.
 * A brief mention here: Christensen, J. (2017). The Power of Economists Within the State. United States: Stanford University Press.
 * There's a full article about them here: https://norwaytoday.info/finance/civita-proposes-50-billion-state-cuts/
 * This academic paper mentions them 37 times https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9477.12184
 * Seems notable. Leaning keep CT55555 (talk) 23:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep: it's not a clear-cut case, but the last item listed by CT seems to be significant coverage. Some of the other sources are not as substantial. However, the paragraph on Civita in The Power of Economists Within the State, albeit short, offers enough analysis for me to lift them over the threshold of WP:GNG. Modussiccandi (talk) 08:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.