Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clásico Ceibeño


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Clásico Ceibeño

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

See WP:NRIVALRY; rivalries are not inherently notable. This rivalry definitely exists  but all I can seem to find are routine match reports such as those attached to this sentence. There is nothing available that could suggest a WP:GNG pass. At the moment, the article is nothing more than just an unsourced collection of match results; the references provided for this don't even work. Spiderone 12:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  12:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  12:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  12:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  12:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment Here is the first link in an archive, .  Unscintillating (talk) 22:54, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 16:42, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NRIVALRY, no evidence of GNG. Simply because two teams play each other regularly does not create a de facto rivalry. Even if there is a rivalry, it has to be demonstrated that this has received significant, reliable coverage as a notion in itself, not simply the synthesis of a series of match reports. Fenix down (talk) 09:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.