Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clásico Mexiquense


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Clásico Mexiquense

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has been tagged as failing to meet Wikipedia's standards for four years now; little has been done to address these issues. I don't believe that this 'rivalry' warrants its own article; the teams haven't met that many times; I can find very little coverage on the internet other than trivial mentions and coverage from unreliable blogs and forums. The article is almost entirely original research. Also see WP:NRIVALRY; rivalries are not inherently notable and WP:GNG needs to be met independently. Spiderone 21:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  21:55, 18 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 11:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NRIVALRY, no evidence of GNG. Simply because two teams play each other regularly does not create a de facto rivalry. Even if there is a rivalry, it has to be demonstrated that this has received significant, reliable coverage as a notion in itself, not simply the synthesis of a series of match reports. Fenix down (talk) 09:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.