Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clèmerson Merlin Clève


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nakon 04:17, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Clèmerson Merlin Clève

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No exceptional notability established other than being a jurist, professor and lawyer. seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  04:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep. WP:N requires that article topics be notable, not exceptionally notable, so the nomination does not appear to advance a valid rationale for deletion. Multiple papers with 100+ cites is notability in any field. I suspect that a GS h-index of 14 will also satisfy criteria 1 of WP:PROF in this field. Law is apparently a very low citation field for academics. According to LSE, the average h-index of a (full) law professor (2.8) is the lowest of any of the social sciences, significantly less than the average across all such disciplines (4.9), and far below the number suggested by Hirsch for a (full) professor of physics (18). James500 (talk) 09:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 07:50, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.