Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clínica Eugin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 05:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Clínica Eugin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An old speey was declined because theye were refe, nevertheless I do not think notability is established. And there is a strong smell of spam. TheLongTone (talk) 16:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Hi! As I explained in the page, I added this company because I think is important enough to be part of the Wikipedia. Is part of NMC Health that already has a page and one of the most important clinics in Spain. Also is an international company (currently in 3 countries) and collaborates in researchs with major spanish universities. If I can do something to improve it, please tell me. Thanks :-) --Dovidena (talk) 16:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC)


 * delete this is just a run of the mill fertility clinic; nothing shows notability and fails GNG. WP is not a directory and it doesn't serve as the webpage for the clinic. Jytdog (talk) 23:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- this content belongs on the company web site, not in an encyclopedia. No notability or significance here, just a company going about its business. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.