Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clair De AHHH


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:16, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Clair De AHHH
A flash animation, no google hits for its title or for their purpoted creators. JoaoRicardo 05:12, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * To quote from the website: Hello.  I am one of the sitemasters and I am working on this website with my friend.  Don't think these are supposed to be really awesome animations because we are only getting the hang of animations.  Some of our videos may cause seizures, and if you don't know what that means, just know that they are not good. Have a good day.  A bit too new for inclusion in my humble opinion.  Delete. - Lucky 6.9 05:24, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Lucky 6.9. Movementarian 06:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising. See Articles for deletion/AirLex Animations. Bo Lindbergh 06:33, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above rationale. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  18:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, vanity, above... take your pick. Ifnord 18:47, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Technostalgia
 * Keep, as there is nothing wrong with it. Google results have been set up, Google has not crawled it yet. See discussion on Articles for deletion/AirLex Animations. Lexington
 * Delete as extraordinarily non-notable. Turnstep 15:53, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable flashcruft. Stifle 23:17, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.