Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Burke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I think the consensus is clear enough after 2 relistings  DGG ( talk ) 00:42, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Claire Burke

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No assertion of notability per WP:BIO, WP:POLITICIAN or WP:AUTHOR; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources; sole claim to notability appears to be that she married into a notable family. Scopecreep (talk) 12:55, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 12:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 12:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 12:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I have attempted to contact this user (including on their IP page), but no response. I'm sure they are well-intentioned, but probably don't realize how quickly all their hard work can be deleted. -- Brangifer (talk) 14:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - I too would like to WP:Assume good faith, but the page's creator is not making this easy by doing things like repeatedly removing the notability tag while logged out, swapping the notability tag for a redundant cleanup tag , removing the failed verification tag from a bogus reference while adding another bogus reference , etc. At this point I'm not surprised that you've had no response. Creator has only begun editing today, but one of their first edits was to add a piped link to a template, so I suspect that this isn't a novice editor. Scopecreep (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I fear you're right, so I won't weep if their work gets deleted. If they won't accept offered help, they're on their own. -- Brangifer (talk) 03:38, 3 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, current version shows no clear claim to notability. Hairhorn (talk) 19:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, no evidence she's notable as an author, or for anything else; could merge a small amount of content to Kennedy family but not sure she is close enough to the family to merit that. --Colapeninsula (talk) 08:49, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.