Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Hazelgrove


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep - Merge (non-admin closure), closing in spite of advice at WP:NAC (I participated in discussion) but full time period has expired and consensus was to merge, which I have done and I have asked for closure, see below; cleaning up to get out of backlog, undo if disagree :-). Fr33kman talk  APW 13:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Claire Hazelgrove

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete Merge (changed vote) - The fact that she is a candidate politician fails WP:POLITICIAN, as does her age as she's not the youngest person to be a candidate. The fact that she's on Yeardot, by itself, is not enough to pass WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:NN. Three failures added together do not generate a pass of WP:Notability. Therefore, unless additional third-party references can be found, her page should be deleted. So, I'm adding a AfD tag and we can let the consensus decide. fr33kman (talk) 02:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC) '''Sorry, I've changed article around to enable pass for WP:NN and to keep it now :-) fr33kman (talk) 03:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant non-local press coverage, merely a candidate for a election. If she was elected she would be notable, perhaps doubly so as this would involve a significant swing in the vote to her party. Tassedethe (talk) 07:59, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Yeardot and redirect. I originally nominated this for speedy deletion as a clear failure of WP:POLITICIAN. However, participation in Yeardot means there may be grounds for inclusion - but, per WP:BIO1E, as part of the Yeardot article, not as an article in its own right. Ros0709 (talk) 10:22, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Yeah, probably agree. Yeardot is notable because it has been referenced by others enough  and because it has a person staring in it Gilly Flaherty who notable in her own right as a premier league female football player for champions Arsenal . It would probably do to have a section there to deal with each person staring in it, but leave Gilly with an article on her own, and put in redirects for the stars names pointing to Yeardot (except Gilly, of course) :-) fr33kman (talk) 22:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, or failing that Merge as above (personally I don't think Yeardot itself is that notable, hence the preference for delete. --Blowdart | talk 13:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sorry folks, I've done quite a bit of work on the article regarding sources and a bit more info. Please take a new look at it now. Thanks! (sorry, idle hands...) :-) fr33kman (talk) 03:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't know, the problem is she's a young candidate; she's not even the youngest candidate ever as the mirror link shows; saying she could be the youngest MP ever would rely on an election falling within the next few months/under a year before she skips past Ms Devlin; indeed she'd also have to hope the Benn lass doesn't get elected either as she would be 2 years younger; so really it needs a by election. It's just too much WP:Crystal for my liking, second youngster and possibilities? No; my delete still stands I'm afraid. --Blowdart | talk 14:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * comment Yes, I'm having the same problems. Good for you, sticking to your vote! :-) fr33kman (talk) 02:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. My Merge !vote also stands. Ros0709 (talk) 19:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge to Yeardot per Ros0709. This is a BIO1E. RS attention from just standing for office does not establish notability per WP:POLITICIAN. A stand-alone article is premature at best. • Gene93k (talk) 09:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I would have thought that being a propsective candidate for Parliament for one of the main parties did provide notability. I assume that she has been gone through the foraml adoption process.  HOWEVER this nomination looks as if it has been withdrawn.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:24, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * No, it does not; see WP:POLITICIAN. It does look like the nominator has had a change of mind but this cannot be procedurally closed by a non-admin because there are Delete !votes. Note also that despite the nominator's change of mind my own !vote (Merge) stands, one other editor has expressly stated that his Delete !vote stands and another editor has since !voted Merge. Ros0709 (talk) 19:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Absolutely! I've withdrawn nothing. Once a nomination has been made it MUST go through the process. :-) fr33kman (talk) 02:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Jerry   delusional ¤ kangaroo 00:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * comment do we have a merge consensus then? I'll do it, ... fr33kman (talk) 04:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * comment So unless anyone else objects, should I just merge the page? undefined Fr33kman talk APW 00:04, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * comment no objections here --Blowdart | talk 05:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

I've merged, and redirected. I've left the AfD tag as it would be a WP:Conflict of interest for me to remove it. Also I can't do a WP:NAC closure of this myself now, so can someone (who knows how) do it, or can an admin close as keep? Thanks Fr33kman talk APW 21:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.