Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Khaw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. this type of shit doesn't merit the oxygen of publicity. per WP:SNOW Scott Mac 17:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Claire Khaw

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Un-noteworthy Gareth53 (talk) 00:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment The subject seems to have gone out of her way to attract attention, and has succeeded in making herself notable. I am not voting keep because as a policy matter I don't think we should be eager to provide additional notability for notability seekers, but I think the article passes WP:BIO and WP:BLP, an will even if some of the sources that are arguable on reliability grounds are removed. Monty  845  00:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: if we discount the references to blogs, which can't be counted as reliable sources, then we have one very short mention in the Guardian of something she said on facebook in the election campaign, and coverage in various newspapers of her Gaddafi facebook group. That coverage is mainly about the facebook group rather than about Khaw herself, and is only one event, so under WP:BLP1E doesn't on its own make her notable enough for an entry. Hence I suggest delete. If the article is kept, we should at least remove the material that's not referenced to reliable sources. --Physics is all gnomes (talk) 00:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete:I stubbed the article, eliminating all matter sourced to blogs and other unreliable sources, and it is now clearly an occurrence of WP:BLP1E. Jonathanwallace (talk) 11:03, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete:One event racists, bigots, and such begone. But allow them come back when they prove to be serial idiots. John lilburne (talk) 13:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - speedier the better. She is not really a notable anything. Off2riorob (talk) 17:10, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.