Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire McVey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:11, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Claire McVey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't believe being the youngest victim of a particular disease meets the criteria for Notability (people). This information is more appropriate for inclusion in the article for the disease itself, Variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. This stubborn editor has also created Grant Goodwin, Sarah Roberts (accountant) and Matthew Parker (teenager), other vCJD victims whose articles are up for deletion as well. — TAnthonyTalk 18:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 20:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. GNG is not met for any of these victims, particularly since most of the sources are not SIGcov. Tragic but not encyclopedic. Gilded Snail (talk) 17:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This article has even less merit than the Grant Goodwin one in that it least tried to get past because he was a unique case (for the moment). This comes nowhere near meeting WP:NBIO and clearly violates WP:BIO1E. --Dom from Paris (talk) 14:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Why are the victims of this disease in the UK more important than victims in other countries? This and its companion articles fail to tack a global look at issues, which is a problem of lots of Wikipedia, but still should be addressed.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 05:29, 8 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.