Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Peacock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)   Ase ' nine ' '' 18:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Claire Peacock

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research of a non-notable fictional character. Tavix (talk) 22:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to whatever wikis are deemed most appropriate (TvWiki being the most obvious, I'm sure there're some others on Wikia that'd work). Include a simple paragraph on the main List of Coronation Street characters article. The detailed exploits of a character who has been on a forty-year show for a grand total of five years are, barring dramatic real-world hysteria of the Who Shot J.R.? variety, unencyclopedic in the utmost. Badger Drink (talk) 23:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep While article needs cleanup, the character appearing on the show for five years is a definite indication of notability. Edward321 (talk) 04:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, Frickative is experimenting in her Sandbox and they are good a finding references, because i saw how they improved Maria Connor but if it dosen't improve redirect to List of Coronation Street characters. User:Notdoppler 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, one day and a complete rewrite later, moving the focus of the article to a real-world perspective, backed up by reliable, third-party sources, and focusing on aspects of the character that have had demonstrable impact outside of the in-universe context of the show, including reaction from real-world advocacy groups etc. Frickative  21:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep notable improvement, meaning the nominator's points are no longer valid.  GunGagdin Moan 11:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep this is now an excellent soap character article.--UpDown (talk) 11:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.