Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Potter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Claire Potter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable academic. Fails WP:ACADEMIC. Ignore the Guardian result when doing your verification searches, she is a different Claire Potter. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:57, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Also be wary of results for Clare Potter! But I note it is an unsourced BLP. Mabalu (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced, full of WP:OR, and no real claim to notability. Not that it bears on notability, but article is likely an autobio or fanpage, as it was created as the first article-space edit of a new SPA. 15:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC).
 * Weak delete for lack of evidence of passing any of the WP:PROF criteria. She's a recently promoted full professor at a good school, though, so most likely the people who promoted her know more than we see here. The complete lack of references is also a problem, but a fixable one. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:21, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:GNG, WP:NACADEMIC. Quis separabit?  02:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.