Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Schreiner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  10:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Claire Schreiner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Schreiner is only almsot notable for winning Miss Wyoming USA. However this is a one event that does not make her notable. Getting engaged to her possibly notable fiance (I am not convinced he is actually notable, but that would be a seperate discussion) is not enough to make her notable. Her sports competition is so far below the threshold of notability it is not even worth mentioning. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep I think she squeaks by because of her engagement to another notable, and doing it in a media friendly way, in addition to the beauty stuff. Although -- not an official measure by any means -- just noting that she only averages 7 pageviews a day while I average 11 pageviews a day so it must mean that yours truly is prettier than Ms Schreiner. And I don't wear makeup! Maybe it's my handyman work.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:34, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * If found to not be independently notable, redirect to Miss Wyoming USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America1000 17:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project.  No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:59, 18 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- the sources offered above only provide trivial mentions re: engagement. Wikipedia is not "society pages"; thus I advocate deletion until the subject becomes more notable on her own right. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge what content may be relevant about their relationship/wedding to Michael Yo's page. She is not wiki-notable independent of him; she is not wiki-notable for the subnational pageant win (as evidenced by the scant coverage of the win); and the coverage on the two do not combine to "substantial coverage" for GNG. (The number of unverified claims in tis entry are smthg of a reminder of why that GNG sourcing requirement exists.) And then I would recommend against a redirect. If some of this is merged to Yo's page, then she'll be mentioned both there and at the pageant's page, and a search for her name will turn up both. I think that's more fair to her and to users, rather than to take it upon ourselves to declare a most-important point of reference for her. Innisfree987 (talk) 03:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, pending outcome of SNG pageant RfC.  Aoziwe (talk) 13:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.