Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Watt-Smith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 15:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Claire Watt-Smith
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable for Wikipedia, just personal promotion/PR, article contains errors, links only to own personal Linkedin page and her company website Sheroddy (talk) 14:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 14:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. "of of the Future 100 Young Entrepreneurs Of The Year" is in our terms an unmistakable "not yet notable" DGG ( talk ) 02:16, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I'm finding more recent sources, so the article is in need of updating: The Industry, Sunday Times, Management today, Marie Claire. There's probably more - this was just a quick G-search. LaMona (talk) 16:48, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now or at best weak keep as LaMona said (but draft & userfy if needed) as my searches found nothing convincingly good, this and this (best results I found aside from a passing mention at Books). BTW, it seems you never notified the author (who is still active) . As I mentioned the possible drafting and userfying, maybe Jpbowen wants to save it in his userspace.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep — she has multiple articles on her in national publications. I have added more references to some of these. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To allow more time for discussion given recent improvements. T. Canens (talk) 22:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 16:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Current version of article clearly demonstrates the GNG is satisfied. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 22:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - It looks like she's reasonably notable. There may be issues with the article needing some clean-up, but this isn't the place for that. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Number of sources appear to confirm notability. Just because an article is promotional does not justify its deletion, it justifies it cleanup. Also, as WP:BEFORE makes clear, a nom should search for sources first, not simply nominate for deletion AusLondonder (talk) 03:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.