Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clan Durie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep but send to WP:CP. Proto :: type  14:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Clan Durie
Notability/importance in question. ghits:[ --NMChico24 10:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep seems historical enough for me Computerjoe 's talk 10:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete copyvio Computerjoe 's talk 18:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Computerjoe. BigHaz 10:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep its another Scottish clan page. people will have interest.mjgm84 11:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as Mjgm84. gala.martin ( what? ) 12:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Scottish clans MLA 13:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as copyvio parts are copied from the Electric Scotland site, which would appear to make it a copyvio. Even if that's fixed, where are the sources ? Verifiability is a non-negotiable policy, and like most of these just-so-story clan articles, this article has no sources. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm confused about the WP:copyvio concerns. This seems practically a stub right now. Unless I'm missing something, couldn't this two-sentence article be easily re-written to avoid copyvio concerns? And if it really is copyvio from the Electric Scotland site, isn't that a source then? I don't understand how this article fails both WP:copyvio and WP:V. Verifiable sources must be provided, but I'm inclined to think this article can easily be salvaged. Am I missing something? Allisonmontgomery69 15:55, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I stubbed it after tagging it. The previous version was this. It is not all verbatim, but it is in parts and other parts are very close paraphrases:


 * becomes


 * Changing one or two words does not make it original work. I asked the creator just now for an explanation re copyright status, we'll see. Verifiability means WP:RS. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:COPY. Angusmclellan is right, changing one or two words does not negotiate copyvio.  Killfest2 — Daniel.Bryant  10:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.