Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clandestine operations

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was merge and redirect. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:12, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

clandestine operations
It's not actually about clandestine operations at all. It's about the "LaCrosse System", which we already have covered in Lacrosse (satellite). There's nothing here worth saving, a redirect from this to Lacrosse (satellite) seems inappropriate, and covert operation explains that the two are not the same. Let the redlink in Requested articles/Social Sciences and Philosophy grow properly, afresh. Uncle G 11:29, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
 * I would redirect this to espionage, and merge anything new in the Lacrosse (satellite) article. -- Smerdis of Tlön 11:50, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect as above. &mdash; RJH 14:40, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge, Redirect per Smerdis of Tlön's excellent suggestion. -- 8^D gab 15:28, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
 * delete not all clandestine operations are necessarily espionage so that redirect is not approriate. This information can not be merged with  Lacrosse (satellite) as the two articles seem to contradict each other. Clandestine operations claims the Lacrosse system is a "infared (sic) technology system" while the other article claims the Lacrosse satellite are equipped with a "synthetic aperture radar" which to my, albeit limited, understanding is not the same thing. Dsmdgold 02:07, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.