Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clap note


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Clap note

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't establish for sure that this is notable. It has been unreferenced and tagged for notability for many years, and there don't seem to be the amount of sources available to show notability. Boleyn (talk) 07:00, 9 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  07:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: no sources, seems to be made up. — Alien333 (what I did &amp; why I did it wrong) 10:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: no references to this term that I can find online other than this article, no matches in Google Books or archive.org. Assuming it existed in the first place, it doesn't seem to have entered public usage. Adam Sampson (talk) 15:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.