Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clara Chu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. There is no such thing as "partial" notability or partial compliance to both meeting retention. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 16:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Clara Chu

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete - Article whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline, see especially WP:BIO and Notability_(academics).
 * No independent reliable sources have shown that this person has made a significant impact in their impact in their scholarly discipline.
 * The awards cited are not highly prestigious.
 * This person is not a member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association.
 * This person's scholarship has not impacted a substantial number of academic institutions.
 * This person does not hold an endowed or distinguished chair.
 * This person has not held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at an academic institution or major academic society.
 * There is no evidence this person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
 * This person has not been editor-in-chief of a major well-established journal in their subject area.
 * This person is not in the field of literature or fine arts that meet the standard for notability in that art. See WP:CREATIVE or WP:MUSIC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Destitute (talk • contribs)
 * Keep – I believe Ms. Chu meets our requirements as an expert, under the Nobility guidelines, for inclusion here at Wikipedia. I was impressed with her scholarly works, as shown here at Google Scholar  and found some impressive interviews at Google Books as shown here .  In addition, there were a few interviews at Google News as provided here .  Each taken independently, would probably not warrant inclusion.  However, taken as a whole, I believe meets our standards.  Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 19:22, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 19:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver  seren C 19:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added a number of sources. Admittedly, most of them are just mentions, which would mainly be used to reference specific facts about her, but taken with the information that Shoessss supplied above, I believe it establishes notability. Silver  seren C 19:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete The scholarly sources have not been cited very much and there are no major news sources about this person. It is borderline if she is a department head, but overall I think it should be deleted. MiRroar (talk) 20:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet GNG or guidelines for academics.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 02:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This biography does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for academics. That a source mentions her in passing is not very good evidence for her notability. I was unimpressed with her scholarly works, which have not been highly cited. That she does not meet any of the criteria that Wikipedia specifies, which have been detailed in the first response, suggests that this article should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.132.232 (talk) 07:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC) — 98.151.132.232 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete I agree, doesn't meet the guidelines for academics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tebp (talk • contribs) 19:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. By my count, Chu has an h-index of 9, but by the nature of her work has also received news coverage in non-academic media. I believe that the combination of the two establishes notability. -- Radagast3 (talk) 02:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Google news search produces results.   D r e a m Focus  08:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.