Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clare McLaren-Throckmorton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  06:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Clare McLaren-Throckmorton

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

She gets a few mentions here and there, but nothing substantial. Her article spends a fair amount of space covering her relationship with the Throckmorton Baronets, but notability is not inherited. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. The person isn't notable, just because they had a relationship with someone else who is.   Raa   G   gio  (talk)   05:38, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 09:08, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 09:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep -- Where mansions were given to the National Trust it was (or is) the practice for the owner and his/her successors to be permitted to occupy the house. For various reasons, such occupation has not always continued, but this is a case where it has.  I think this just about makes her notable.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:52, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Keep, notable nobility. Emily Jensen (talk) 00:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep (weak) Her descent doesn't look notable to me. The ancestor a few hundred years ago who tried to depose a monarch - now he might be notable, but this later descendant, hardly.  OTOH, checking the news search, there are a fair number of articles that involve her as head of a couple of organizations, particularly the ancestral estate.  So...  Ja, keep.  David V Houston (talk) 01:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.