Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clare Quilty (group)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nousernamesleft copper, not wood 02:34, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Clare Quilty (group)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Closing another AfD recently, I said that having an AMG entry was a sign of notability; but I don't think this band passes WP:MUSIC, even with their AMG listing of two singles that reached 33 and 44 in a minor chart. Searching for info is naturally difficult because of their name, but this one dug up lots of irrelevant hits and little info. They might be notable; but it's difficult to tell, and certainly not from the article. Black Kite 23:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Between the two chart singles and three albums on DCide Records I'd say they meet WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Um, that's my point really. The "chart singles" are on the Club Play chart, and the record label certainly isn't notable enough to meet WP:MUSIC either.  It's sort of getting there, but.. Black Kite 00:03, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, although it's close. My rule of thumb with AMG is not just an entry, but a bio; not sure which you meant. They have credits for a lot of people that would never pass WP:MUSIC, but when there's a bio, that tracks very closely with whether there are other sources. I'm finding PopMatters reviews of two albums and Washington Post and Washington Times reviews of shows. --Dhartung | Talk 00:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The Club Play chart is set up specifically to note the most popular songs within the dance music genres; it's no less legitimate than the Modern Rock or R&B charts. Chart hits are definitive proof of a group's popularity. Chubbles (talk) 00:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 02:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The lack of citations from reliable sources indicates to me that the article fails to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 20:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Complies with WP:MUSIC at least on the grounds of chart success and coverage. A cursory search finds numerous reviews and commentary from the legitimate music press on the band and its albums. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Debate (talk • contribs) 05:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.