Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claremont Review of Books


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Appears to be notable: speedy keep of bad-faith nomination with boilerplate rationale. Drmies (talk) 00:51, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Claremont Review of Books

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be notable based on sourcing. The parent may or may not be, but it would not inherit to here. Herp Derp (talk) 22:55, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.