Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clarence Schmalz Cup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Consensus has already been reached. Direct concerns to here. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 07:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Clarence Schmalz Cup

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is the challenge trophy for the Junior C league of a Canadian provincial hockey league. Sorry, but I fail to see how that qualifies as notable. Guy (Help!) 19:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions.   —Djsasso (talk) 20:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong keep - "JzG/Guy", I find myself a little bewildered at your actions as of late. Why did you bother posting an AfD for this article if you felt you could get away with just flat out deleting the entire series of leagues and their teams without notice?  The Clarence Schmalz Cup is an article that has been on wikipedia without contention for almost two years.  It is the grand championship of the third tier of Ontario hockey.  This level is a part of the feeder system of the National Hockey League.  The "C" or "third tier" is only determined by the size of the towns and cities involved -- not skill level or notability.  It has been a part of hockey tradition for ... i don't know... 70 years.  DMighton (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Luk  suh  20:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep please understand a sport before nominating its articles for deletion. -Drdisque (talk) 20:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It is very much a notable trophy. -Djsasso (talk) 20:34, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep – very historic and notable trophy. Flibirigit (talk) 21:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep as per above. paranomia (formerly tim.bounceback) a door? 22:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, at least this one's tagged properly ... Keep Championship that has been competed for since the 1930s. Plus, if the teams and leagues are notable, then the trophy that's awarded to their champion certainly is as well. Clearly notable but, if the article doesn't demonstrate it, tag it so that the community knows it needs improvement. Mlaffs (talk) 17:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a trophy that has been awarded for 70 years now. Its history alone asserts and establishes notability. Resolute 22:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.