Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clarendon Road Presents: A Plastic Free Record


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 08:19, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Clarendon Road Presents: A Plastic Free Record

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC; references are to Weebly blogs, a Youtube video and an iTunes link. No prejudice towards a recreation, though. Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 07:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:27, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:27, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep — This article should not be deleted because it is an upcoming non for profit album that is yet to be released. It also has a song that is dedicated to the 5 Gyres institute, and a certified vevo channel. The album is also available for pre-order on iTunes. Also, there are not a lot of articles that were published yet about the album, so therefore the article will expand as the album is released. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thearticlehelper101 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 13 August 2018 (UTC) — moved from inappropriate heading by me at 19:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC). Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 19:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi! Those all things are not of much importance in establishing the notability of an article, an article must be in compliance with either Wikipedia's general notability guidelines or Wikipedia's guidelines for music. Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 19:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * This is not an article that is related to India, so maybe we could get a person who knows about albums to propose this album for deletion... This is because I have a very large background in album, and single wikipedia pages. I have created and contributed to many of Jack Johnson's single, and album pages. I have also been a pioneer in the Bahamas' albums and tours, as well as Nikki Yanofsky & Wyclef Jean articles. This article is very well written and is also specialized in Jack Johnson. Therefore I am for this article to stay up. Thank you!  Wikipedia's general notability guidelines or Wikipedia's guidelines for music. Regards, User:JozefM0000000003 (Talk) (Contributions). 3:56pm, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi! Like I have said those are of not much importance to Wikipedia and don't establish notability; Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and not a platform to publicise a cause, however good may it be. The concerned article doesn't cite even a single reliable source and doesn't meet Wikipedia's guidelines for albums, either as it hasn't landed on the charts for any nation's charts for music. This article not being concerned with India has no value and doesn't back up your argument.
 * Sidenote — I intend to open sock-puppet investigations against these accounts, as, they might be handled by one, single person and may be in violation of Wikipedia's policies on alternative accounts; there's a lot of behavioural and non-behavioural similarities among the accounts. You may want to disclose any conflict of interest or sock-puppets you may have, else, you'd be running the risk of an indefinite block from an admin. Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 00:48, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello! If this article is agreed to be deleted, could be at least make it an article draft until smore articles are made about it Regards, User:JozefM0000000003 (Talk) (Contributions). 8:14pm, 14 August 2018 (US eastern time)
 * Hi! Yep, that is an option, that should be considered; I urge the concluding admin to draftify this article per the creators wishes so that they can work to further improve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SshibumXZ (talk • contribs) 21:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC) ; edited 21:12, 14 August 2018 (UTC) and 14:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC).
 * Okay thank you! Let's just keep the article up for a few more days to see if anything else is published about it! If that doesn't work than I can just copy the article and make a draft of the article. But please don't delete the article until I copy it and make it into a draft! Regards, User:JozefM0000000003 (Talk) (Contributions). 10:47pm, 14 August 2018 (US eastern time)


 * Keep — This article should be kept because it has more notable information that just a track list. If you were to read thoroughly through the Notability (music) albums section, you would see that the album would need general notability and little more than just a tracklist. Well this album has far more information than just a tracklist. It also has a lot of general notability because the album is raising money for a non for profit organization, and the albu is on iTunes. Therefore this article should be kept on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadhadhad13 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - it is not the presence of information in the article that counts for notability because anybody could just make an article longer by making stuff up. The problem with this article is that almost all of the information beyond the tracklist is from the same people who are trying to sell the album. If you are going to quote the notability standard, look at the whole thing, including the following from the very top of the WP:N page: "We consider evidence from reliable and independent sources to gauge this attention. The notability guideline does not determine the content of articles, but only whether the topic should have its own article." ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:27, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree with the nominator's reasoning, and see also my comment above. Since this is a future album being released 10 days from this vote, I would not oppose recreating the article after the album is released, AND it gets noticed by reliable and independent sources. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note for closing admin – I've made a determination of sockpuppetry concerning users who have !voted here at Sockpuppet investigations/Biggles325. Thanks, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 21:32, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - as currently it meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:NALBUM. Blatant attempt at advertising for a non-notable album – OK, I know you could be charitable and say "it hasn't been released yet, give it a chance and see if it gets any reviews", but in this case it's extremely unlikely – it's only going to be sold from the organization's website, hosted on a Weebly blogging page, and the fact that even the local press in Albany have never written an article about Clarendon Road suggests the notability of the organization doesn't reach much further than the road itself. The organization is currently under discussion as a redirect for possible deletion at Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 August 18 because there is no mention of it anywhere on the internet, even in blogs. The notability of the Bahamas Plastic Movement is also very dubious. The only bluelink in the main track listing, for Raymond DeMarco, is also up for AfD (for a third time) as it keeps being recreated with transparently faked citations. The album includes a bonus track from Jack Johnson and there is an element of WP:COATRACK about the edits of the creator of this article, attempting to create articles about anything tangentially connected with Johnson. Richard3120 (talk) 11:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.