Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clash-A-Rama


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Clash-A-Rama

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Every "source" is just the Clash of Clans website itself or a YouTube video. Which makes everything a primary/self source or synthesis in relating the happenings in a video with no third-party mentions at all. Seems to not be notable in the least except for the popularity of the game on which it is based, but that doesn't confer notability to this. If not outright deleted should be a one or two paragraph section on the Clash of Clans article. JesseRafe (talk) 14:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:49, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Sourced almost entirely internally to this Youtube channel. No sign of wider notability.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Since Clash of Clans has a large audience its having a web series is mentioned on some gaming websites; I added one to the article. --Frmorrison (talk) 16:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment, then isn't that an endorsement for this content being a section on the game's article? Notability is not inherited and this as a series has not demonstrated much notability. JesseRafe (talk) 19:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.