Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clash Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Clash Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a custom Google search of reliable music sources. The label's founder didn't meet the notability guidelines either, so there are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 13:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  czar  13:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  czar  13:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - no refs, no notability. I'd say redirect to the founder Bong-Ra, but he doesn't have an article and probably no refs and no notability. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 13:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: there's actually probably a better chance of an article on Bong-Ra passing notability than one for his record label: Bong-Ra has played at many of the most famous outdoor festivals in Europe, including the Glastonbury Festival, and he recorded a session for John Peel on his legendary BBC Radio 1 radio show in 2002. However, Clash Records itself appears to have been defunct since 2012 and released only 14 singles, most by artists even more obscure than Bong-Ra himself. Richard3120 (talk) 21:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I saw this earlier and planned to comment, none of this actually suggests there are particularly better signs of notability improvements, there's nothing else convincing here. SwisterTwister   talk  18:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.