Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic Series, Vol. 1 (Selena)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Unforgettable (Selena). — Jake   Wartenberg  15:40, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Classic Series, Vol. 1 (Selena)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

These albums are simply remastered releases of early Selena albums. I have attempted to merge and redirect the articles to the original album only to be reverted on more than one occasion. I still support a redirect of each. There are five volumes in all. Wolfer68 (talk) 02:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * → Alpha (Selena album)
 * → Muñequito de Trapo
 * → And the Winner Is...
 * → Preciosa (album)
 * → Dulce Amor

Agreed.The same has been done regarding Unforgettable: Limited Edition in redirecting to Unforgettable (Selena). MaJic ( talk ) 21:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 23:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Support redirect. I was unable to find much in the way of sources, but I think that the albums are still notable however it seems unlikely they can be full content. It's more an editorial issue thatn anything else.Martin Raybourne (talk) 04:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Whether this content should be included in standalone articles or merged is not a deletion issue, and should be handled on the relevant talk pages. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Support redirect. Although I agree with Hullaballoo Wolfowitz that this may be handled better on the talk pages, in this case where there have been multiple reversions, deletion is at least a viable possibility, and so I don't have a problem with dealing with this at AfD. Rlendog (talk) 19:03, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.