Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic style


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete, nonsense (pro-choice and pro-wife?), and a good part of this is a copyvio from The Literary Mind. — Verrai 19:07, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Classic style

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A "new written animal". Apart from one linkless reference there is no evidence that this species/breed is at all notable. -- RHaworth 08:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article itself, in one of its sillier passages, concludes that "there is not enough evidence for the existence of classic prose". (The reference is completely irrelevant; according to Google Books, the phrase "classic style" does not appear in The Literary Mind.) Zetawoof(&zeta;) 09:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WP:NONSENSE. --Evb-wiki 12:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, made-up neologism. NawlinWiki 19:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.