Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classical office furniture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Classical office furniture

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Topic reads like a guidebook, seemingly original research, flagged with a variety of fundamental issues for 4+ years but hasn't really been touched. Nsteffel (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Best case, this is unreferenced, sometimes incomprehensible original research. Worst case, this contains copyright violations via machine translation of one of Hu Desheng's Chinese-language works on Ming and Qing Dynasty furniture. Some of it certainly reads like a machine translation of something. Regardless, I don't see anything here of value, and I don't think this title defines a coherent topic anyway. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 20:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:37, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete/salvage into Chinese furniture (no redirect) Article is about Ming and Qing dynasty-styled furniture, and nothing even majorly specific to "office". Whatever useful could be salvaged away but overwhelmingly this should be deleted without sources.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 04:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete This is an article about chines furniture & should have been speedied as an article on a topic for which there is already an article. Title is too ambiguous to be suitable as a redirect.TheLongTone (talk) 13:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I suppose if this is best. SwisterTwister   talk  06:59, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If kept, Rename to Chinese antique office furniture and prune. Nevertheless, I am far from convinced of the merits of having it at all.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. Bearian (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.