Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claude L. Kulp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Claude L. Kulp

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to meet WP:ACADEMIC and has no sources to establish notability. —Eustress talk 00:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Notability is sound in that he has an auditorium named after him. However, the article is very weak with regard to WP standards. It needs a proper bio page and a photo of either the person or the auditorium would help. More references such as the ones found in this search shows he is mentioned by name in several books. If that list is added to the article then it would bolster the Notability and would go to a solid Keep.  Golgofrinchian  (talk)  16:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The mere mention of his name in books would not satisfy WP:ACADEMIC. You might be on to something with the auditorium, although I can't find anything explaining why the auditorium was named after him (was he the benefactor?) and it is just a small high school auditorium.
 * Unless some concrete evidence emerges in support, I still think this one may be a delete. —Eustress talk 18:12, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni↑talk↓  03:12, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Have to disagree with Eustress. This subject has 'not notable' stamped all over it.. Associate Commissioner of the New York State Education Department is the highest he got; all the Gsearch reveals are trivial mentions or mentions within school bulletins, which are only to be expected. Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 02:41, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. After all this time on AfD the sourcing in the article is still completely inadequate, and there is no evidence that he passes WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: no indication that the topics meets WP:PROF, and no other claim to notability. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 19:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.