Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claude Lhotecký


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Claude Lhotecký

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

With only one match at the professional level, he is certainly not notable. FromCzech (talk) 16:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 16:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 22:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - I found Deník but it's paywalled. Not sure if it's WP:SIGCOV. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * He was used as a substitute in fully professional Czech First League match
 * Source - official webpage of Fortuna Liga: https://www.fortunaliga.cz/zapas/6644-brn-olo Pospeak (talk) 12:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * He was used as a substitute in fully professional Czech First League match
 * Source - official webpage of Fortuna Liga: https://www.fortunaliga.cz/zapas/6644-brn-olo Pospeak (talk) 12:09, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: BLP, fails GNG and BIO. One mention in an article about a game and two primary ELs. BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  20:55, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.