Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claude and Eustace Wooster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 17:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Claude and Eustace Wooster

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Violation of WP:FICT. Minor fictional characters. No need for article. Merge useful content to one of the four articles on Wodehouse minor characters, and delete or redirect.Wehwalt 09:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * delete. I've just added the info to Minor_characters_in_the_Jeeves_stories (which needs much work) and corrected the link in List of P. G. Wodehouse characters. Squiddy |  (squirt ink?)  12:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep They are a running theme in many of the Jeeves stories, some of which are about them primarily. More could be said about them; I have put the expand template on that article. Minor character is a character not a leading plot element in any story, or a leading plot element in only 1. Perhaps numbers may help on this. DGG 01:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * For all intents and purposes, these are minor characters who have a walk on in a several stories, and a more significant role in one. The single story alone would not make them notable, in my view.  How does being non notable in several stories make you notable?--Wehwalt 18:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. I would have supported merging to Minor characters in the Jeeves stories, but Squiddy has already boldly done that.  Their entry there (along with that of any other character without a separate article) can be expanded.  If some enterprising editor adds enough content about them, we can always revisit whether they need a separate article.  I think it's a better process to have one article about all the minor characters, then break out articles about individual subjects as needed.--Kubigula (talk) 04:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.