Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Black Online


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. clear web A7, no evidence or asserion of notability for the website. TravellingCari 02:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Claudia Black Online

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. This is an unremarkable fansite, which doesn't meet WP:WEB. The awards this site is supposed to have received are not from well known publication or organisation. Deadly&forall;ssassin 23:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge into Claudia Black - perhaps. Non-notable per WP:WEB. --Regents Park (sink with my stocks) 23:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough sources, not enough to merge in my opinion. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep -delete- she is prominent enough that surely sources can be found. This isn't the best article, but perhaps some time should be given for it to get more sources.  What is the membership like?  It could be significant.JJJ999 (talk) 23:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC) On further inspection, it fails notability.JJJ999 (talk) 21:18, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - she might be notable enough, but the question is whether this website is. --Deadly&forall;ssassin 03:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   --  TwentiethApril1986   (want to talk?)  00:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 *  Delete SPEEDY Delete although Claudia Black may be notable and verifiable enough for inclusion this article is just spam for the non-notable website.Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7 - web content -- Mattinbgn\talk 00:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- Mattinbgn\talk 00:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.