Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Costa (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Claudia Costa
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:PORNBIO - Cyber Girls of the Week and Playboy Mexico's Playmate of the Month are non-notable pornographic awards. Also has not made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre. Imrie (talk) 10:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment As stated 4 months ago, porn stars do not all get into Playboy (any version).  Playboy playmates do not all do Porn films.  Confusingly, PORNBIO states it is set to address "Pornographic actors and models"... but all its sub-sets only apply toward persons involved in porn films... and do not actually address individuals who are not.  So the problem in using this section of BIO for this individual is seen in that even with inclusion of the word "model" in its header, the section only addresses notability of persons involved in the making of porn films.  Use of this particular guideline and its various sub-sets become inapplicable to BLPs of persons NOT actually involved in porn films.  It's like using a thermometer to measure gravity... the measuring device being used is just not correct for the task at hand.  Heck... we might as well state that she fails WP:ATH as well.  Editors might perhaps look toward more applicable guidelines... and in this case we might better consider WP:GNG for determining if someone is worthy of note. Time to look for Spanish sources about this person.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:53, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete? Following the news link, I see only 1 reference to her in the first four pages, and that's hosting a Lapdance on 'Stripperween'.  Doesn't look notable to me David V Houston (talk) 14:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ENT, no indication that the subject can satisfy the GNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:47, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.