Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Ebacher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Claudia Ebacher

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable. Unreferenced/ BLPPROD concurrently running with this AFD. Attempted to move back to Draft:Claudia Ebacher but was reverted. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  01:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC) Removing BLPPROD, if it survives this discussion, it will have a reference. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  01:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  01:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  01:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  01:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete and/or redraftify with page-move protection. Television and radio presenters are not handed an automatic notability freebie just because they exist — the notability test is not "does this person exist as a holder of a job?", it is "has this person verifiably won any major awards for her work, and/or received a significant volume of media coverage about her, in order to establish that her work in her job is externally validated as important?" So simply stating that she exists as a person with a job, the end, is not how you make her notable, and the creator moving the page from draftspace to mainspace themselves when it's still in a very inadequate state is not acceptable Wikipedia process. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and reference a proper article that actually demonstrates notability — but she isn't automatically entitled to have an article just because she exists. Additionally, per Sockpuppet investigations/20kids the creator has been blocked for sockpuppeteering. Bearcat (talk) 14:05, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the argument above. Kolma8 (talk) 16:09, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not all TV presenters are notable, and nothing indicates she is.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete for being unreferenced and no claim to notability. Ifnord (talk) 21:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per John Pack Lambert. 2001:569:74D2:A800:CDA:FF3B:6E23:CE98 (talk) 02:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note Editor who moved page from draft,, has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. db-banned does not apply due to timing. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  18:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.