Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Ellquist (1st nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus.  howch e  ng   {chat} 18:31, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Claudia Ellquist
Article on a very obscure, non-notable person. The google test fails miserably (250 hits) and the article is probably vanity --Mecanismo 22:25, 8 December 2005 (UTC) Relisting this to generate more discussion. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 18:33, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 16:26, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems notable enough as Arizona activist and political figure who has run for office. -- JJay 01:23, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per above Deyyaz 16:14, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Relisting due to insufficient votes. - Mailer Diablo 09:54, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * DeleteNon notable. Running for local office in itself is not notable.Obina 11:44, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Relisted twice -- no consensus to delete -- Speedy-keep --SockpuppetSamuelson 15:18, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, excessive relisting. Kappa 17:16, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per no consensus to delete Jcuk 20:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, no concensus to delete. - squibix 20:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What's with all the bureaucracy all of the sudden? Judge the article on its own merits, not the quality or the history of nomination. Flyboy Will 23:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree it is borderline, but she represents a fairly significant body and is therefore notable. --Davril2020 08:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.