Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia K. Williams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cabayi (talk) 08:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Claudia K. Williams

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to fail WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE, WP:NPOL, and WP:BASIC. The CEO of a non-notable health company and a government health advisor at a level that doesn't appear high enough for WP:NPOL. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 19:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 19:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 19:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 19:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Her position as a mid- or low-level government advisor does not satisfy WP:NPOL. KidAd   talk  19:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems relatively unimportant. Agree with nom. Oaktree b (talk) 01:00, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per WP:SIGCOV. Her work seems to be important, and she has over 5,000 followers on Twitter @claudiawilliams, but there's been no coverage in secondary sources about her. Ping me if you find better sources. Bearian (talk) 20:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete She has plenty of mentions and seems to have some importance but I can't find a single substantial treatment of her in a reliable source. Currently fails WP:GNG. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 11:08, 29 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.