Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Pastorino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Claudia Pastorino

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Only reference is her own website. Rathfelder (talk) 20:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 20:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 20:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete unless someone can find accurate, reliable, notable reporting, which I can't upon a quick google.--Bettydaisies (talk) 01:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete it is a true outrage that an article sourced only to the subject's own website has survived for over 15 years. We are still paying for the original sin of Wikipedia, valuing quantity far, far more than quality.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unsoucured BLP. Just to be sure, I looked online, and found zero newspaper articles, a few passing mentions in Italian magazines of her work with animals, and unrelated sources about a similarly named scientist. I found a few passing mentions in (possibly unreliable scandal-type) Italian media, but also a review of a single starring turn. That's not enough for WP:SIGCOV. Bearian (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.